If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They appear like tiny boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. safe distance from cell tower for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a kilogram of tissue.
But, since safe distance to live from cell phone tower operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
If you've ever used a cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the farther you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body, and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the consequences of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs, based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin diseases such as acne.